Limitations

Content Flow drafts from the source text you paste. It does not have independent knowledge of your topic, your organisation, your product, your customer, or the current state of anything in the world. If a fact is not in the source text you provide, the tool cannot verify it and should not be trusted to include it accurately.

Drafts are intended as a starting point, not a finished product. Read them carefully. Edit them. Fact-check anything specific. The tool's automated review helps but does not replace judgement about tone, appropriateness, factual accuracy, or fit for the intended audience.

Content Flow is not designed to check drafts for legal compliance, regulatory requirements, medical accuracy, safety-critical claims, or any similar approval process. Nothing the tool produces should be treated as approval that content is safe to publish. Where content needs sign-off from a qualified person, that sign-off still needs to happen.

The automated review inside Content Flow checks profile match, format compliance and source faithfulness. These checks are useful indicators. They are not guarantees. A draft that passes the review can still be wrong for its context, and a draft that flags a warning can still be perfectly fine in your judgement. The reviewer's role is to point at things worth looking at, not to decide.

A style profile reflects the writing samples used to build it. Thin, unrepresentative or mixed-voice samples produce thin, generic or inconsistent profiles. See Getting started with style profiles for practical guidance on choosing good samples.

Even with a well-tuned profile and clean source text, generated drafts often need editing. Word choice may not be quite right. Rhythm may be slightly off. A sentence may need cutting. This is normal. The tool aims to save time on the first draft, not to eliminate the editorial pass.